Cifuentes, MelisaMelisaCifuentesJaviera RiquelmeN. Falcon NaserJ. Barros PuertasJ. Arenas Kalil2025-08-252025-08-252020-10-2110.1016/j.acuro.2020.08.0072-s2.0-85093659067https://cris-uv-2.scimago.es/handle/123456789/3698WOS:000636786900007Introduction and objectives: Gender dysphoria is associated with mental health comorbidity, such as depression and suicide. “Gender affirming surgeries” improve sexuality and psychosocial well-being. The goal of vaginoplasty is for the genitalia to resemble in form and function to a biological vagina with a depth of at least 11 cm and a sensitive clitoris. In addition, the urethra must be shortened and allow voiding in a sitting position. Our objective is to describe the aesthetic, sexual and urinary results. Patients and method: Retrospective study of all patients undergoing feminizing genitoplasty, at Hospital Sótero del Río between 2018 and 2019, that met WPATH requirements. Vaginal dimensions, neo-clitoral sensitivity, aesthetic and sexual satisfaction of the neovagina, questionnaires Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS), IPSS-QoL, uroflowmetry and post-void residue were evaluated. Results: 10 women who underwent feminizing genitoplasty were identified. The neovaginal depth average was 14.2 cm. There was no rectal injury or reoperation. There was 100% of Neoclitoris sensitivity and 88% satisfaction with the neovaginal width. The FGSIS averaged 25.4 points and the FSFI averaged 16 points. The IPSS was 6.7 points, the average Qmax was 22 ml/s and post-void residual volume average was 22 ml. There was no neomeatal stenosis. Conclusions: Feminizing Genitoplasty is a complex, demanding and not completely standardized surgery. However, it is a relatively safe procedure that achieves adequate aesthetic, sexual and urinary results.esacceso restringidoUrology And NephrologyUrologyarticle