Teriparatide for Guided Bone Regeneration in Craniomaxillofacial Defects: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies

<jats:p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of teriparatide (TP) in guided bone regeneration (GBR). An electronic search without language or date restrictions was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Scielo, and gray literature for articles published until June 2025. Inclusion criteria considered studies evaluating the effect of TP on bone regeneration, analyzed using SYRCLE’s Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-four preclinical studies were included, covering diverse craniofacial models (mandibular, calvarial, extraction sockets, sinus augmentation, distraction osteogenesis, segmental defects) and employing systemic or local TP administration. Teriparatide consistently enhanced osteogenesis, graft integration, angiogenesis, and mineralization, with potentiated effects when combined with various biomaterials, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP), biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), octacalcium phosphate collagen (OCP/Col), enamel matrix derivatives (EMDs), autografts, allografts, xenografts (Bio-Oss), strontium ranelate, and bioactive glass. Critically, most studies presented a moderate-to-high risk of bias, with insufficient randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding, which limited the internal validity of the findings. TP shows promising osteoanabolic potential in guided bone regeneration, enhancing bone formation, angiogenesis, and scaffold integration across preclinical models. Nonetheless, its translation to clinical practice requires well-designed human randomized controlled trials to define optimal dosing strategies, long-term safety, and its role in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgical applications.</jats:p>