Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Guidelines In Low And Middle Income Countries Paper 2: Quality Assessment Of Chilean Guidelines: Need For Improvement In Rigor, Applicability, Updating, And Patients' Inclusion
 
  • Details
Options

Guidelines In Low And Middle Income Countries Paper 2: Quality Assessment Of Chilean Guidelines: Need For Improvement In Rigor, Applicability, Updating, And Patients' Inclusion

Date Issued
2020-08-24
Author(s)
Arancibia, Marcelo  
Facultad de Medicina  
Loezar, Cristóbal  
Facultad de Medicina  
Madrid, Eva  
Facultad de Medicina  
Papuzinski, Cristian  
Facultad de Medicina  
Pérez, Javier  
Facultad de Medicina  
Vargas, Manuel  
Facultad de Medicina  
Javier Bracchiglione
Nicolás Meza
Gabriel Rada
Camila Ondarza
Catalina Jahr
Carlos Daniel Cadena
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.018
WoS ID
WOS:000589799000001
Abstract
Objectives: The Chilean health system mandates providers to ensure assistance under a guaranteed system, the Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare (EGH) program. The Health Ministry has developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but independent assessment of their quality is lacking. Study Design and Setting: We assessed all CPGs of the EGH program using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool for appraising quality, validity period, and last update. Results: Eighty-six CPGs were published between 2005 and 2016. Only 15 (17.4%) were updated. The overall mean raw score was 4.18 (±0.98). The scaled scores for each domain were: Scope and objectives 79.7%, Stakeholder involvement 46.2%, Rigor of development 36.3%, Clarity of presentation 82.8%, Applicability 23.5%, and Editorial independence 39.2%. The highest items were: overall objectives described, population described, options for management clearly presented, and key recommendations easily identifiable. The worst evaluated items were: views and preferences of the target population, strengths and limitations of the body of evidence, methods for formulating the recommendations, external review by experts, and description of facilitators and barriers to application. Conclusion: Most Chilean CPGs included in the EGH program are outdated and show items that should be improved, mainly through a more rigorous methodology, the inclusion of patients in its development, and appropriate consideration of its applicability.
Subjects

Epidemiology

Health Care Sciences ...

Public, Environmental...

OCDE Subjects

Medical And Health Sc...

Quartile (Date Issued)
Q1
License
acceso restringido

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science