Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Copper Analysis By Two Different Procedures Of Sequential Extraction After Electrodialytic Remediation Of Mine Tailings
 
  • Details
Options

Copper Analysis By Two Different Procedures Of Sequential Extraction After Electrodialytic Remediation Of Mine Tailings

Date Issued
2019-10-17
Author(s)
Lazo, Pamela  
Facultad de Ciencias  
Andrea Lazo
Alejandra Urtubia
Claudia Gutiérrez
Henrik K. Hansen
Lobos, Gabriela  
Facultad de Ciencias  
DOI
10.3390/ijerph16203957
WoS ID
WOS:000494779100171
Abstract
The analysis of Cu distribution in pre-treated mine tailings after electrodialytic remediation was carried out by using two methods of sequential extraction. The initial content of copper in the tailings was 1109 mg Cu/kg of dry tailing, where close to 40% of the sample in weight corresponded to a soluble fraction. The tailing was treated with a leaching solution for 24 h. Three different solutions were tested: H2SO4 + HNO3 with pH = 1.9; H2SO4 + HNO3 with pH = 4.2; and NH4Cl 0.8 mol/L with pH = 5.5. After that, electrodialytic remediation experiments were carried out using an electric field of 2.7 V/cm for 15 days. The best performance for the complete cell was obtained with H2SO4 + HNO3 solutions, with a copper removal efficiency in the range of 62% to 67% and a current efficiency between 6% and 9%. The results of the remaining copper concentration between anode and cathode, from both procedures of sequential extraction, showed similar trends. The differences were mainly attributed to the use of different extractant solutions and extraction times. Soluble and exchangeable fractions were easily removed, with efficiencies higher than 80%. The lowest copper removal efficiency was obtained with NH4Cl 0.8 mol/L.
Subjects

Environmental Science...

Health, Toxicology An...

Public, Environmental...

Public Health, Enviro...

OCDE Subjects

Natural Sciences::Ear...

Quartile (Date Issued)
Q2
License
acceso abierto

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science