Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis: a systematic review and grade recommendations
 
  • Details
Options

Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis: a systematic review and grade recommendations

Journal
European Psychiatry
Date Issued
2025
Author(s)
Adrien Goncalves
Susana Ochoa
Steffen Moritz
Łukasz Gawęda
Cavieres, Álvaro  
Facultad de Medicina  
Caroline König
Rabea Fischer
Antonia Meinhart
Maria Lamarca
Rosa Ayesa-Arriola
Ryan Balzan
Kerem Böge
Tania Lecomte
Stéphane Raffard
Fabrice Berna
DOI
10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10027
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:sec id="S0924933825100278_sec1">
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>Recent meta-analyses support the inclusion of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in schizophrenia treatment. Metacognitive Training (MCT) for psychosis is a psychoeducational program derived from CBT, with most meta-analyses showing favorable results. Although meta-analyses are commonly used in clinical practice to guide evidence-based decision-making, the grading system provides complementary results by offering a structured approach for assessing the strength and reliability of evidence and deriving grades of recommendations accordingly.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec id="S0924933825100278_sec2" sec-type="methods">
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>Our research applies the guidelines from the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) to propose grades of recommendation for MCT for psychosis, analyzing 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1942) and 10 meta-analyses. The primary outcome was positive symptoms, with secondary measures including negative symptoms, general psychopathology, self-esteem, functioning, insight, and cognitive function.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec id="S0924933825100278_sec3" sec-type="results">
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>Our findings are primarily based on the risks of bias attributed to RCTs (11 high, 19 moderate, 6 low) and, when necessary, on the overall confidence attributed to meta-analyses (3 low, 7 critically low). According to the WFSBP guidelines, strong recommendations should be made for using MCT for psychosis to improve post-treatment positive symptoms, delusions, and total psychotic symptoms (WFSBP-grade 1). Limited recommendations (WFSBP-grade 2) could be made for using MCT to improve post-treatment visuospatial abilities and to maintain benefits over time in psychopathology, functioning, self-esteem, episodic memory, and attention.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec id="S0924933825100278_sec4" sec-type="conclusions">
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>MCT for psychosis is an evidence-based program, especially for positive symptoms, with long-lasting clinical benefits. These recommendations should be interpreted with caution given potential residual biases and heterogeneity among studies.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science