Options
Systemic Oncological Treatments In Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Scoping Review And Evidence Map
Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Date Issued
2023-01-09
Author(s)
Josefina Salazar
Javier Bracchiglione
Roberto Acosta-Dighero
Nicolas Meza
Adriana-G. Meade
María Jesús Quintana
Carolina Requeijo
Gerardo Rodríguez-Grijalva
Marilina Santero
Anna Selva
Ivan Solà
Xavier Bonfill
Karla Salas
Alba Antequera
Ariadna Auladell-Rispau
Gerard Urrútia
Pamela Meinardi
Juan Irassar
Daniel Simancas
Rosario Dorantes
Angela Merchán
Yahveth Cantero
Edgar Hernandez
Miguel Sugrañes
WoS ID
WOS:000911477800002
Abstract
Purpose: To identify, describe, and organise currently available evidence regarding systemic oncological treatments (SOTs) (chemotherapy, targeted/biological therapies, and immunotherapy) compared to best supportive care (BSC) for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: We conducted a scoping review and evidence mapping, adhering to PRISMA-ScR checklist. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, PROSPERO, and clinicaltrials.gov for eligible studies. We included systematic reviews (SRs), randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and observational studies evaluating SOTs compared to BSC or no treatment in patients with advanced PC. Two independent reviewers performed the screening process and data extraction. We developed evidence maps as an interactive visualization display, including the assessed interventions and outcomes. Results: Of the 50,601 records obtained from our search, we included 43 studies: 2 SRs, 16 RCTs, 4 quasi-experimental studies, 20 observational studies, and 1 protocol for a quasi-experimental study. Forty-two studies reported survival-related outcomes and most favoured SOTs, while five reported toxicity and most favoured BSC. Other patient-centred outcomes, such as quality of life, were scarcely reported. Conclusions: This study highlights the current evidence gaps in studies assessing treatments for patients with advanced PC, mainly the lack of reports of non-survival-related outcomes, pointing out research areas that need further attention to make better recommendations for these patients.
OCDE Subjects
Quartile (Date Issued)
Q1
License
acceso abierto