Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Fragility Fracture Classification Using Axial Transmission Raw Signals And Multi-Channel Convolutional Neural Network
 
  • Details
Options

Fragility Fracture Classification Using Axial Transmission Raw Signals And Multi-Channel Convolutional Neural Network

Journal
2024 IEEE UFFC Latin America Ultrasonics Symposium (LAUS)
Date Issued
2024-01-01
Author(s)
Daniel Diaz
Williams Flores
Aguilera, Ana  
Facultad de Ingeniería  
Olivares, Rodrigo  
Facultad de Ingeniería  
Muñoz Soto, Roberto  
Facultad de Ingeniería  
Minonzio, Jean-gabriel  
Facultad de Ingeniería  
DOI
10.1109/laus60931.2024.10553065
WoS ID
WOS:001259224600026
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by bone loss and increased risk of fragility fractures (FF). It's clinically defined based on the current gold standard, Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Axial Transmission (AT), an ultrasonic device, has been proposed as a DXA alternative. Recently, authors have proposed using raw radiofrequency signals (RS) collected with an AT device and a multi-channel convolutional neural network (MCNN) to classify patients with or without FF. This study aims to improve the classification using a different AT device RS and an optimized MCNN. A previous clinical study database was used to achieve this objective, with 14,937 raw signals from 195 patients, 91 with FF and 104 without FF. Patients were split into train (70%) and validation (30%). The MCNN architecture contains 5 blocks: convolution, max pooling, drop out, and batch normalization layers. A flattened vector is completed using the following clinical data: age, BMI, and cortisone intake. The results using 5-fold Stratified cross-validation showed an average accuracy of 0.76 and loss of 0.72, which was above the accuracy obtained with DXA (acc = 0.65) and the same patients.
Subjects

Signal Processing

Safety, Risk, Reliabi...

Radiology, Nuclear Me...

Acoustics And Ultraso...

OCDE Subjects

Medical And Health Sc...

Quartile (Date Issued)
SQ
License
acceso restringido

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science