Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Valparaiso’s 2014 Fire: Evaluation of Environmental and Epidemiological Risk Factors During the Emergency Through a Crowdsourcing Tool
 
  • Details
Options

Valparaiso’s 2014 Fire: Evaluation of Environmental and Epidemiological Risk Factors During the Emergency Through a Crowdsourcing Tool

Journal
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
ISSN
1935-7893
Date Issued
2016-09-13
DOI
10.1017/dmp.2016.117
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="S1935789316001178_abs1" sec-type="general"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To describe and relate the main environmental risk factors in the emergency process after a large urban fire in Valparaiso, Chile, in April 2014.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1935789316001178_abs2" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>An observational, cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. All 243 reports from an ad hoc web/mobile website created on the Ushahidi/Crowdmap platform were reviewed. Reports were recorded in a new database with dichotomist variables based on either the presence or absence of the relevant category in each report.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1935789316001178_abs3" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Almost one-third of the reports presented data about garbage (30%) and chemical toilets (29%). Reports related to water, infrastructural damage, and garbage had significant associations with 4 categories by chi-square test. In the logistic regression model for chemical toilets, only the variable of water was significant (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>value=0.00; model<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>value: 0.00; R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>: 11.7%). The “garbage” category confirmed infrastructural damage (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>value: 0.00), water (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>value: 0.028), and vectors (P value: 0.00) as predictors (model<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>value: 0.00; R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>: 23.09%).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S1935789316001178_abs4" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Statistically significant evidence was found for the statistical dependence of 7 out of 10 studied variables. The most frequent environmental risk factors in the reports were garbage, chemical toilets, and donation centers. The highest correlation found was for damaged infrastructure, vectors, and garbage. (<jats:italic>Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness</jats:italic>. 2017;11:239–243)</jats:p></jats:sec>
Author(s)
Espinoza, Sebastián  
Facultad de Odontología  
Anibal Enrique Vivaceta De la Fuente
Constanza Andrea Machuca Contreras

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science