Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Utilising Systematic Reviews To Assess Potential Overtreatment And Claim For Better Evidence-Based Research: An Analysis Of Anticancer Drugs Versus Supportive Care In Advanced Esophageal Cancer
 
  • Details
Options

Utilising Systematic Reviews To Assess Potential Overtreatment And Claim For Better Evidence-Based Research: An Analysis Of Anticancer Drugs Versus Supportive Care In Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Journal
Systematic Reviews
Date Issued
2024-07-18
Author(s)
Marilina Santero
Adriana-Gabriela Meade
Anna Selva
Olga Savall-Esteve
Javier Bracchiglione
Ismael Macías
Leire Leache
Paula Cerdà
Xavier Bonfill Cosp
Roberto Acosta-Dighero
Alba Antequera
Ariadna Auladell-Rispau
Yahveth Cantero-Fortiz
Edgar D Hernández
Juan Irassar
Pamela Meinardi
Angela Merchán-Galvis
Nicolas Meza
María Jesús Quintana
Carolina Requeijo
Gerardo Rodríguez-Grijalva
Karla Salas-Gama
Josefina Salazar
Olga Savall-Esteve
Ivan Solà
Gerard Urrútia
Pérez, Javier  
Facultad de Medicina  
DOI
10.1186/s13643-024-02594-1
WoS ID
WOS:001271748000001
Abstract
Background: Highlighting the identified gaps in evidence-based research concerning advanced esophageal cancer (EC) treatment and care, this review evaluates the efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs compared to supportive care for advanced EC patients, aiming to assess the appropriateness of usual treatments and identify the gaps that need to be filled with primary research. Methods: We searched (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Epistemonikos, and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological/targeted therapy) with supportive care in advanced EC. The results were summarised using GRADE summary of finding tables. Results: We included 15 RCTs. Most studies did not have a special focus on EC, did not detail the treatment lines in all patients, and did not evaluate all outcomes. Anticancer drugs may result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86; MD 0.83 months) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.49, 0.64, MD 0.68 months), but also may increase toxicity (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13, 1.65), without a significant improvement in quality of life. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to indirectness of results and lack of specific focus on EC in some studies. Conclusion: RCTs on advanced EC lack specificity, detailed treatment line information, and evaluation of all relevant outcomes. Moreover, when they find any benefit, this is negligible. Therefore, the certainty to justify anticancer drug treatments instead of supportive care in advanced EC is low or very low, and this information should be actively shared with affected patients. More and better RCTs should be conducted to assess whether any old or new proposed treatment for advanced EC patients provides a better balance of benefits and harms than the supportive care. Systematic review registration: The study protocol was registered in OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6) on 2022–03-29.
Subjects

Medicine, General And...

Medicine

OCDE Subjects

Medical And Health Sc...

Quartile (Date Issued)
Q2
License
acceso abierto

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science