Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Valor De La Resonancia Magnética Cardíaca Para El Diagnóstico Diferencial En Pacientes Con Sospecha De Infarto Agudo De Miocardio Con Elevación Del Segmento St Y Arterias Coronarias Normales
 
  • Details
Options

Valor De La Resonancia Magnética Cardíaca Para El Diagnóstico Diferencial En Pacientes Con Sospecha De Infarto Agudo De Miocardio Con Elevación Del Segmento St Y Arterias Coronarias Normales

Date Issued
2020-10-01
Author(s)
Diaz, Rienzi  
Facultad de Medicina  
Henríquez, Carlos
Facultad de Ciencias  
Danilo Silva González
DOI
10.4067/s0034-98872020001001406
Abstract
Background: Patients hospitalized with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have normal coronary arteries (CAs) on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) may have an AMI or another acute cardiac disease that mimics it. Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for diagnosing conditions resembling AMI with normal CAs. Material and Methods: We studied 424 consecutive patients admitted with suspected STEMI who underwent ICA. Those with normal CAs underwent CMRI involving cine-CMRI sequences to evaluate segmental wall motion, T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery imaging to detect oedema and delayed contrast enhancement (DCE) after gadolinium administration to identify necrosis/fibrosis. Patients with previous myocardial infarction were excluded. Results: Twenty-six patients (6.1%) had normal CAs. Definitive diagnosis after CMRI was acute myocarditis in 11 patients (42.3%) whose DCE was localized in the subepicardium or intramyocardially but not in the endocardium, AMI in nine patients (34.6%) who had subendocardial or transmural DCE, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) in six patients (23.1%), whose CMRI showed regional contractility abnormalities of the left ventricle and myocardial oedema but not DCE. Conclusions: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging allows a precise diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries.
Subjects

General And Internal ...

Medicine

OCDE Subjects

Medical And Health Sc...

Quartile (Date Issued)
Q3
License
acceso abierto

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science