Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • Researchers
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Current Research Information System UV
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Bi-Directional Axial Transmission Measurements Applied In A Clinical Environment
 
  • Details
Options

Bi-Directional Axial Transmission Measurements Applied In A Clinical Environment

Journal
PLOS ONE
Date Issued
2022-12-30
Author(s)
Minonzio, Jean-gabriel  
Facultad de Ingeniería  
Donatien Ramiandrisoa
Johannes Schneider
Eva Kohut
Melanie Streichhahn
Ulrik Stervbo
Rainer Wirth
Timm Henning Westhoff
Kay Raum
Nina Babel
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0277831
WoS ID
WOS:000925813500039
Abstract
Accurate measurement of cortical bone parameters may improve fracture risk assessment and help clinicians on the best treatment strategy. Patients at risk of fracture are currently detected using the current X-Ray gold standard DXA (Dual XRay Absorptiometry). Different alternatives, such as 3D X-Rays, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) devices, have been proposed, the latter having advantages of being portable and sensitive to mechanical and geometrical properties. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the performance of a Bi-Directional Axial Transmission (BDAT) device used by trained operators in a clinical environment with older subjects. The device, positioned at one-third distal radius, provides two velocities: VFAS (first arriving signal) and VA0 (first anti-symmetrical guided mode). Moreover, two parameters are obtained from an inverse approach: Ct.Th (cortical thickness) and Ct.Po (cortical porosity), along with their ratio Ct.Po/Ct.Th. The areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was obtained using DXA at the femur and spine. One hundred and six patients (81 women, 25 men) from Marien Hospital and St. Anna Hospital (Herne, Germany) were included in this study. Age ranged from 41 to 95 years, while body mass index (BMI) ranged from 16 to 47 kg.m −2 . Three groups were considered: 79 non-fractured patients (NF, 75±13years), 27 with non-traumatic fractures (F, 80±9years) including 14 patients with non-vertebral fractures (NVF, 84±7years). Weak to moderate significant Spearman correlations ( R ranging from 0.23 to 0.53, p < 0.05) were found between ultrasound parameters and age, BMI. Using multivariate Partial Least Square discrimination analyses with Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (PLS-LOOCV), we found the combination of VFAS and the ratio Ct.Po/Ct.Th to be predictive for all non traumatic fractures (F) with the odds ratio (OR) equals to 2.5 [1.6-3.4] and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) equal to 0.63 [0.62-0.65]. For the group NVF, combination of four parameters VA0. Ct.Th, Ct.Po and Ct.Po/Ct.Po, along with age provides a discrimination model with OR and AUC equals to 7.5 [6.0-9.1] and 0.75 [0.73-0.76]. When restricted to a smaller population (87 patients) common to both BDAT and DXA, BDAT ORs and AUCs are comparable or slightly higher to values obtained with DXA. The fracture risk assessment by BDAT method in older patients, in a clinical setting, suggests the benefit of the affordable and transportable device for the routine use.
Subjects

Multidisciplinary Sci...

OCDE Subjects

Medical And Health Sc...

Quartile (Date Issued)
Q2
License
acceso abierto
Open Science Path
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Product(s)
Descriptive characteristics as mean and standard deviation for the first population (106 patients).  
Spearman’s correlation coefficients <i>R</i> between BDAT parameters, age and BMI, for the first population (106 patients).  
Spearman’s correlation coefficients <i>R</i> between BDAT and DXA parameters and the second population (87 patients).  
Discrimination obtained with PLS-LOOCV: <i>p</i> values, odds ratios (OR) and areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for both BDAT and DXA techniques for the two populations (106 and 87 patients).  

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Hosting & Support by

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science